One scale for every product
Pebbles Ai is scored on the same axes and the same 0 to 100 scale as everyone else.
AI memory and meeting notes tools compared: the GTM landscape
How 46 AI memory and meeting notes tools compare on what assistants remember and carry into later work. Editorial scores from Pebbles Ai's research, with Pebbles Ai on the same scale.
Memory
What assistants remember and carry into later workPebbles Ai on each axis
- Business context80 out of 100Highest rival 90
- Memory scopes80 out of 100Highest rival 80Joint top
- Memory lifecycle60 out of 100Highest rival 90
- Memory governance30 out of 100Highest rival 90
- Connected GTM workflow80 out of 100Highest rival 60Top score
- User-set autonomy80 out of 100Highest rival 90
Positioning map
Pebbles Ai
Business context across, Memory governance up, both 0 to 100. Arrow keys move between products.
Not scored on these axes: Spinach AI
Every axis
Pebbles AiOther productsMedian
Business context
What it measures
Company, GTM and work-system knowledge available alongside memory (CRM, accounts, brand, connected sources).
80Memory scopes
What it measures
Distinct, isolated memory levels such as user, project, team, tenant and agent.
80Memory lifecycle
What it measures
Capture, retrieval quality, correction, supersede and forget, including temporal handling.
60Memory governance
What it measures
User and admin controls: visibility, admin switches, role checks, retention, export, audit and compliance.
30Not scored: Spinach AI
Connected GTM workflow
What it measures
How many of eight go-to-market stages run natively in one workspace: account research, lead discovery, CRM records, grounded drafting, mailbox send, social publishing, calendar actions and memory.
80User-set autonomy
What it measures
Whether the user chooses how far the AI acts on its own, from asking before each action to acting, and how widely that choice applies across mail, CRM, calendar, social and connected tools.
80
Agent memory score matrix
0 to 100, Pebbles Ai pinned first
| Pebbles Ai | Pebbles Ai | 80 | 80 | 60 | 30 | 80 | 80 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChatGPT Memory and projects | Suite | 40 | 60 | 70 | 70 | 60 | 90 |
| Claude Memory (Team and Enterprise) | Suite | 40 | 60 | 60 | 80 | 60 | 90 |
| Dust | Adjacent | 80 | 40 | 40 | 80 | 60 | 80 |
| Gemini personal context | Suite | 60 | 30 | 60 | 50 | 60 | 40 |
| Glean (memory and agents) | Suite | 90 | 40 | 60 | 80 | 60 | 70 |
| Microsoft 365 Copilot Memory | Suite | 70 | 30 | 50 | 90 | 60 | 50 |
| Notion AI | Suite | 70 | 50 | 40 | 70 | 60 | 40 |
| Writer (Enterprise Brain and Agent Memory) | Suite | 80 | 50 | 50 | 80 | 60 | 40 |
| Perplexity Memory (incl. Enterprise) | Suite | 40 | 70 | 50 | 60 | 50 | 40 |
| Grok memory | Suite | 20 | 40 | 50 | 30 | 30 | 60 |
| Mem | Adjacent | 20 | 20 | 40 | 20 | 30 | 10 |
| Reflect | Adjacent | 10 | 20 | 30 | 40 | 30 | 10 |
| Spinach AI | Adjacent | 60 | 40 | 50 | Not scored | 30 | 40 |
| Tana | Adjacent | 50 | 50 | 40 | 30 | 30 | 20 |
| Guru | Adjacent | 70 | 50 | 70 | 80 | 20 | 10 |
| Cognee | Open source or DIY | 60 | 50 | 70 | 50 | 10 | 10 |
| LangMem and LangGraph Store | Open source or DIY | 20 | 60 | 70 | 30 | 10 | 10 |
| Letta | Open source or DIY | 20 | 60 | 80 | 40 | 10 | 10 |
| Mem0 (Platform, OpenMemory, graph) | Direct | 30 | 80 | 90 | 70 | 10 | 10 |
| MemOS | Open source or DIY | 20 | 70 | 60 | 30 | 10 | 10 |
| Supermemory | Direct | 50 | 80 | 80 | 70 | 10 | 10 |
| Limitless and Rewind | Adjacent | 10 | 20 | 20 | 30 | 0 | 10 |
| Memobase | Direct | 20 | 30 | 50 | 30 | 0 | 10 |
| Zep and Graphiti | Direct | 40 | 80 | 90 | 80 | 0 | 10 |
Swipe to see every axis
Meeting notes score matrix
0 to 100, Pebbles Ai pinned first
| Pebbles Ai | Pebbles Ai | 10 | 50 | 60 | 60 | 80 | 80 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avoma | Adjacent | 80 | 80 | 80 | 60 | 50 | 50 |
| Sybill | Adjacent | 70 | 80 | 80 | 60 | 50 | 50 |
| Attio Call Intelligence | Adjacent | 50 | 60 | 80 | Not scored | 60 | 40 |
| Notion AI Meeting Notes | Suite | 50 | 60 | 20 | 60 | 60 | 40 |
| Read.ai | Direct | 80 | 70 | 50 | 50 | 40 | 40 |
| Zoom AI Companion and My Notes | Suite | 60 | 70 | 40 | 70 | 40 | 40 |
| Day.ai | Adjacent | 60 | 70 | 90 | 60 | 60 | 30 |
| Fireflies.ai | Direct | 80 | 80 | 60 | 60 | 40 | 30 |
| Gong | Adjacent | 80 | 80 | 90 | 80 | 60 | 30 |
| Bluedot | Direct | 70 | 70 | 40 | 50 | 30 | 20 |
| Chorus (ZoomInfo) | Adjacent | 70 | 70 | 80 | 70 | 50 | 20 |
| Circleback | Direct | 70 | 80 | 60 | 50 | 30 | 20 |
| Fathom (Superhuman) | Direct | 80 | 70 | 60 | 50 | 40 | 20 |
| Google Meet Take notes for me | Suite | 50 | 60 | 20 | 70 | 10 | 20 |
| Granola | Direct | 70 | 80 | 50 | 60 | 30 | 20 |
| Jamie | Direct | 60 | 70 | 40 | 80 | 30 | 20 |
| Krisp | Adjacent | 70 | 60 | 40 | 50 | 20 | 20 |
| MeetGeek | Direct | 70 | 70 | 50 | 50 | 30 | 20 |
| Microsoft Teams Intelligent Recap | Suite | 60 | 70 | 40 | 80 | 20 | 20 |
| Otter.ai | Direct | 90 | 70 | 50 | 60 | 30 | 20 |
| tl;dv | Direct | 80 | 70 | 60 | 50 | 40 | 20 |
| Meetily and Vexa (Whisper-based OSS) | Open source or DIY | 50 | 40 | 10 | 60 | 10 | 10 |
Swipe to see every axis
Scores are editorial estimates (0 to 100) from Pebbles Ai's own research, not measured benchmarks.
How to read the landscape
Compare within a direction
Each subdirection has four axes of its own, plus two shared by all. Read a score against its neighbours only.
A blank is not a zero
Where a score is missing, the research did not rate that product on that axis.
Share or cite this page
Copy the link or a ready-made citation, so your readers can find the original.
AI memory and meeting notes tools compared: the GTM landscape Pebbles Ai https://trypebbles.ai/resources/gtm-competitive-landscape/memory
Questions about AI memory and meeting notes tools
What does the AI memory landscape compare?
It compares 46 AI memory and meeting notes tools on what assistants remember and carry into later work. The direction has two parts, each with its own map and products: agent memory and meeting notes. Pebbles Ai is scored beside them on the same scale.
Which axes are AI memory and meeting notes tools scored on?
Each part has six axes. In agent memory, the first four are Business context, Memory scopes, Memory lifecycle and Memory governance. In meeting notes, the first four are Capture coverage, Summary and action depth, GTM and CRM context and Control and governance. The last two, Connected GTM workflow and User-set autonomy, are shared by every direction, so you can compare the same things across the whole landscape.
Where does Pebbles Ai stand in AI memory?
In agent memory, Pebbles Ai has the top score on Connected GTM workflow and is joint top on Memory scopes. In meeting notes, it has the top score on Connected GTM workflow and User-set autonomy. On every other axis, at least one product scores the same or higher. Each badge is worked out from the scores, never assumed.
How are the AI memory scores produced?
They are editorial estimates from Pebbles Ai's own research, on a scale from 0 to 100. They are not measured benchmarks or rankings. A blank cell means a product was not scored on that axis, not that it scored zero. Pebbles Ai is scored on the same scale as every other product.
Your next chapter
See where Pebbles Ai fits your stack
Bring the job you need done. Compare it against the directions that matter to your team.
